The Western Front WWU   |   Dept. of Journalism   |   Contact Us
Bellingham, Washington
Saturday, July 04, 2009
Advertisement


TOP STORY: Trustees approve 2009-'10 operating budget : click here.

 
Searching for a Blackboard solution PDF Print E-mail
by Jay Allyn   
Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Complaints from both students and professors about vanishing grades and failed downloads along with complete system crashes; have prompted the university to look into a new course management system to replace

Blackboard Academic Suite, the current course management system used by the university.  

Western’s computer science department is in the process of testing a new e-learning software this summer quarter that could potentially replace Blackboard sometime next year.  Blackboards potential replacement is a software called Moodle.

“I think students tend to find [Blackboard] more frustrating especially when it goes down and they have something due for a class and cannot access it,” said David Bover, chair of the computer science department.

After investigating multiple alternative e-learning software and course management systems, the department settled on testing a program called Moodle.

Moodle will have all the same basic features expected from an e-learning platform.  Professors will still be able to post grades, upload documents and assignments and communicate with students through e-mail.  This is good for professors like Takele Seda of the physics and astronomy department, who use Blackboard for these very reasons but had problems with its functionality.  

Seda said he likes Blackboard because he can put all his information for his students on it, but he has had problems with downloading certain files.

The major difference between Moodle and Blackboard is that Moodle is an open source, modular-based system.  

When software is open source, it means that anybody can view and write the code that makes up the program and create plug-ins that allow customization and increased functionality.  Plug-ins can quickly be created or taken freely from the Internet that allow different features to be added such as graphical themes, content filters, resources, activities and other specific functions.  This allows for rapid development of features and the quick fixing of bugs but will place extra administrative load on the computer science department, who will have to maintain Moodle, Bover said.

Open source also means Moodle is  free software, a benefit to the university, which currently pays to use Blackboard.

An open source program might also be appealing to professors who create their own course Web sites.  With Moodle, professors will be able to install plugins or create their own to fit specific needs for their course.

“I have the Web site construction skills to create my own online course syllabi and other online course support materials, so I’ve never bothered using Blackboard,” said Michael Karlberg, professor from the communications department.

Moodle is being tested in two computer science classes this quarter.   The test will cover overall efficiency, stability, ease of use and whether students and professors prefer Moodle over Blackboard.  

Summer quarter is low impact so it is a good time to do a trial run before making any final decisions, Bover said.

“The students seem to be quite enthusiastic about it,” Bover said.


Share this article:
Digg!     Reddit!     Del.icio.us!     Google!     Facebook!     Slashdot!     Newsvine!     



  Comments (2)
Posted by westernstudent333, on Jul. 17, 2008 12:46PM

I'm a little confused. There is absolutely no mention of ATUS in this article. They are the group that manages Blackboard, and THEYwould be the ones to decide if the University would quit using it or not...NOT the Computer Science department. There is definitely some missing information in this article.
Posted by crookd, on Jul. 21, 2008 05:00PM

I remember a question my boss asked me several years ago - \"...now, it\'s not going to break, right?\". I said \"Well, assuming I\'ve programmed it perfectly (); it\'s based on a Microsoft platform, it depends on WWU\'s network, it depends on WWU servers, it depends on end-users to enter the data, it needs internet service, and it needs electricity; but as long as nothing goes wrong with any of that, sure - why would it ever break?  
 
Open source can mean a lot of things, but \'free\' isn\'t one of them. There\'s more to overall cost than the initial purchase price, tempting as it may be to ignore the mundane stuff like the extra time, training and salaries it will take to support it for both application programmers and server support staff, the risk of having no customer service / no business entity to hold responsible, a new learning curve for end-users, and so on. There\'s also the big one to think about - WWU\'s brain-drain. What happens when the one or two indispensable people who are really good at programming/maintaining it quit so they can pursue a job in Seattle for a higher salary? 
 
Maybe Moodle is better than Blackboard, all things considered...but don\'t over-simplify the value or vulnerabilities of Blackboard on your way to that conclusion. What\'s the proverb...\"...the grass is always greener...\". I think Aespo has another good one about dog dropping his bone in a stream.

Only registered users can post comments.
Please login or register.

 

Advertise with us
 



Bookmark and Share
Login or Register





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Pollster
What is your favorite lawn game?
 
Syndicate
Subscribe to receive Western Front news feeds!
PDF Version
Archived PDF's
| Front Page | Search | Archive | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Classifieds |
© 2009 The Western Front. All Rights Reserved.